Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: Matterport 3D scanner

  1. #1
    Member mjajansen's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 26, 2011
    Posts
    134
    Current Local Time
    06:54 AM

    Matterport 3D scanner

    I was looking at this scanner to use for scanning houses and small offices and wanted to know if anyone here has any experience with it?

    Big pro is that it's only 3200 euro and has fast scantimes. Also the stitching is automated in the cloud.
    Cons will be the accuracy (99%), but how much accuracy do we really need for existing buildings?
    Last edited by mjajansen; October 12th, 2018 at 08:21 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Andres Franco's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 21, 2012
    Location
    Tours, France
    Posts
    815
    Current Local Time
    06:54 AM
    Hi, 90% of our work here is renovation so I do a lot of existing buildings, here We are using this scanner: Measurix France Basically is a Laser which you can point at each point you want to be measured, the tool draws automatically in a tablet so you can check if your scan is correct or not, the PRO is at the end you obtain a IFC file which you can use as a reference to draw you existing building in revit, the tool is accurate as the user take care of each point. the cons is that is not a point cloud is an IFC but for me it works fine, HTH

  3. #3
    Forum Co-Founder Twiceroadsfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 7, 2010
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    9,626
    Current Local Time
    11:54 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by mjajansen View Post
    I was looking at this scanner to use for scanning houses and small offices and wanted to know if anyone here has any experience with it?

    Big pro is that it's only 3200 euro and has fast scantimes. Also the stitching is automated in the cloud.
    Cons will be the accuracy (99%), but how much accuracy do we really need for existing buildings?
    Unless my information is outdated, isn't the accuracy on the Matterport something like +/- 1", per foot? Is that right still?

    I can't speak for you, but there is no way that would be even close to good enough, for me, on an existing building.

    Sent from my Phablet. Please excuse typos... and bad ideas.

    Aaron Maller
    Director
    Parallax Team, Inc.

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    December 9, 2010
    Location
    Erie, PA
    Posts
    18
    Current Local Time
    12:54 AM
    Matterport says accuracy is ‘generally accurate to within 1% of reality’ which is sufficiently accurate for many uses.

  5. #5
    Forum Co-Founder Twiceroadsfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 7, 2010
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    9,626
    Current Local Time
    11:54 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by rspeicher View Post
    Matterport says accuracy is ‘generally accurate to within 1% of reality’ which is sufficiently accurate for many uses.
    "One Percent" isn't a unit of distortion over distance. It's marketing bullshit. I want to know how much it's accuracy wanes the farther you get from the scanner.

    I've read it's a lot (one inch at a foot) which would take an insane amount of scans to be useful.

    If what I've read is wrong... Awesome! But I would (seriously) rely on a tape measure before something that's off by an inch per foot.

    Sent from my Phablet. Please excuse typos... and bad ideas.

    Aaron Maller
    Director
    Parallax Team, Inc.
    cganiere likes this.

  6. #6
    The Moderator with No Imagination MPwuzhere's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 14, 2010
    Location
    Coeur d Alene, ID
    Posts
    4,523
    Current Local Time
    09:54 PM
    If I remember right....field measurements are being off a half/inch to an inch over 20-30 feet. An inch per foot is terrible. Hand measurement is probably more precise.

  7. #7
    Forum Addict GMcDowellJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 21, 2010
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,398
    Current Local Time
    10:54 PM
    For surrounding context models, it should be alright.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #8
    Member mjajansen's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 26, 2011
    Posts
    134
    Current Local Time
    06:54 AM
    1 inch per foot is indeed a lot, that's why i asked if anyone has any experience with it.
    I like the part where i have all the photo's and outlets for power in the scan.

    Maybe combine the scan with some handmeasurements.

  9. #9
    Member Hirvio's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 8, 2011
    Location
    Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts
    250
    Current Local Time
    06:54 AM
    Few days ago it caught my eye, too. Thing is that it's marketed for real estate business and not for AECO, which says a lot. Maybe this review will help:
    https://www.spar3d.com/blogs/confess...l-3d-scanning/

  10. #10
    Forum Co-Founder Twiceroadsfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 7, 2010
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    9,626
    Current Local Time
    11:54 PM
    Matterport suggests spacing scans 5-8 ft (1.5-2.5m) apart. I pushed it a bit, but met with mixed results (environmentally dependent). In the end, I decided to pace off 8 ft for simplicity.


    That will make for a.... fun... day. Opinions vary, but ill pass on the low cost / high amount of man hours, to make that thing effective.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 3D Scanner for Disney cartoon figure modeling
    By Ning Zhou in forum Architecture and General Revit Questions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: October 10th, 2016, 01:45 AM
  2. Alive in the Lab: New SmartLF Scanner brings back old memories
    By Alive in the Lab in forum Blog Feeds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 19th, 2016, 04:15 PM
  3. 3D Printer / Scanner
    By Ning Zhou in forum Hardware and Infrastructure
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: July 15th, 2013, 10:23 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •