Hi friends,
I was reading a great and very informative thread started by jmk recently https://www.revitforum.org/architect...volve-rig.html where Aaron Maller posted a fantastic rotation rig that I have spent the last week dissecting and learning from (Thanks Aaron!). Naturally, I was inspired to incorporate the rig concepts into my door families since they offer superior flexibility and stability compared to any other method I have seen and tested. Everything works great! However, the plan swing graphics -which I feel like have always been problematic- are proving to be a limiting factor in the power of this rig.
In Marcello Sgambelluri's lecture, Methods That Make Your Revit Families Move, he really demonstrates the potency of utilizing revolve forms in dynamic revit families. Something feels wrong about modeling the plan swing as a 3d revolve object instead of as a line, but as far as I can tell it is totally stable and follows the flexibility of the rotation rig perfectly.


I would love to hear feedback on whether this method might be or not be viable for plan swings. I am not aware of much development or discussion on
-specifically- plan swings in the last few years. It feels like we reached a point of good enough and settled for that. Thanks, and have a wonderful Memorial Day weekend!
I was reading a great and very informative thread started by jmk recently https://www.revitforum.org/architect...volve-rig.html where Aaron Maller posted a fantastic rotation rig that I have spent the last week dissecting and learning from (Thanks Aaron!). Naturally, I was inspired to incorporate the rig concepts into my door families since they offer superior flexibility and stability compared to any other method I have seen and tested. Everything works great! However, the plan swing graphics -which I feel like have always been problematic- are proving to be a limiting factor in the power of this rig.
In Marcello Sgambelluri's lecture, Methods That Make Your Revit Families Move, he really demonstrates the potency of utilizing revolve forms in dynamic revit families. Something feels wrong about modeling the plan swing as a 3d revolve object instead of as a line, but as far as I can tell it is totally stable and follows the flexibility of the rotation rig perfectly.
I would love to hear feedback on whether this method might be or not be viable for plan swings. I am not aware of much development or discussion on
-specifically- plan swings in the last few years. It feels like we reached a point of good enough and settled for that. Thanks, and have a wonderful Memorial Day weekend!
Comment