One of my latest efforts has been to make our "Title Block" families a bit nicer - in terms of wanting to make them more of an assembly of elements, that can pulled together in different configurations, for different jobs - for different paper sizes etc.
My first attempt has been to make the "title block family" exactly what the category suggests it should be - the title block (as opposed to the sheet entire) - and use a generic annotation family nested within it for the paper/medium itself.
But (and this may be because it's the end of the day) I'm starting to slow up on how/where to take things next.
Since you can't have title block families loaded into one another, and we are still going to want to read the project parameters, it's not like we can use other categories to make "an address block" "a logo block" "a keyplan block" (like we once did with you know what) - so I'm thinking have I reached the end of the road already?
I guess I could make a super family, full of vis parameters, different sized fonts, and loads of rules... but should I bother?
My first attempt has been to make the "title block family" exactly what the category suggests it should be - the title block (as opposed to the sheet entire) - and use a generic annotation family nested within it for the paper/medium itself.
But (and this may be because it's the end of the day) I'm starting to slow up on how/where to take things next.
Since you can't have title block families loaded into one another, and we are still going to want to read the project parameters, it's not like we can use other categories to make "an address block" "a logo block" "a keyplan block" (like we once did with you know what) - so I'm thinking have I reached the end of the road already?
I guess I could make a super family, full of vis parameters, different sized fonts, and loads of rules... but should I bother?
Comment