Hi All, I don't believe there will be an easy and straightforward answer to this question but any guidance or input would be greatly appreciated!
We have a need in our office to sometimes produce two or more drawing sets in the same project, an example being a typical bid or CD set, and then a City Approval set (which is just a filtered version of our CD's).
One of our PM's wants to look into the idea of linking our 3D model into two new Revit files (one for each set) and produce two sets of drawings which reference the same 3D model. To me this seems like it would only create more headaches, but I could be wrong. Has anyone completed a project this way? or would you suggest an alternate? My concern here is how a linked model behaves when trying to create drawings from it, and having two files means loading in things like families twice.
The other option would be to do all sets in one Revit file and duplicate all drawings and sheets (once for each drawing set). Which would also not be ideal.
We have a need in our office to sometimes produce two or more drawing sets in the same project, an example being a typical bid or CD set, and then a City Approval set (which is just a filtered version of our CD's).
One of our PM's wants to look into the idea of linking our 3D model into two new Revit files (one for each set) and produce two sets of drawings which reference the same 3D model. To me this seems like it would only create more headaches, but I could be wrong. Has anyone completed a project this way? or would you suggest an alternate? My concern here is how a linked model behaves when trying to create drawings from it, and having two files means loading in things like families twice.
The other option would be to do all sets in one Revit file and duplicate all drawings and sheets (once for each drawing set). Which would also not be ideal.
Comment