Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dynamo

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Dynamo

    Guys,

    Anyone tried Dynamo yet?
    It seems like a Rhino for Revit and Free. (right?)

    recently I was told to do little research about it.
    If you happened to used this software, please let me know your experience with it.


    Thanks

    Lee

    #2
    Dynamo BIM

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by leetecture View Post
      Guys, Anyone tried Dynamo yet?
      It seems like a Rhino for Revit and Free. (right?)
      Originally posted by BoBMudd2 View Post


      It's akin to Grasshopper (Rhino) for Revit, yes. But also rather different. Dynamo also has very practical uses and the ability to query any model data which makes in more in line with BIM than purely a geometry creation engine. Have a read of the DynamoBIM forum as was rightly pointed out by BoBMudd2.

      Sol Amour

      Architectural Explorer, Digital warrior, Affectual adventurer and Curious Human Being
      Portfolio Website @ Cargo Collective

      Comment


        #4
        You’re doing a disservice to Grasshopper by comparing it to Dynamo. Grasshopper is light years ahead of Dynamo and used by all major architectural, structural and engineering firms. Not only is it the best tool for form finding but more so for computational acoustic analysis, structural parametric design, egress, energy analysis, light analysis etc. design. The problem with Dynamo is not necessarily the way it’s built, but the fact that it’s built on Revit, which has huge modelling limitations. While Dynamo will continue to grow and one day may reach the same mature level as Grasshopper, Revit’s development is as good as done and will suffer a slow death. This means that Dynamo will have to halt its development eventually, unless Inventor or any other modeling software gets hold of Dynamo.

        The users also plays a vital role in the development of Dynamo. Because Rhino users are generally designer or engineers seeking solution for the high end side of architecture, structural, acoustics, etc. grasshopper was develops for and by this segment of the market. They require a different set of tools. Dynamo which started off the same way as Grasshopper, doesn’t have that segment of the market to further develop its tools in the same was Grasshopper did. The average Revit user is a draftsman working for a local firm on projects that don’t require computational design tools. He rather have a proper working text tools in Revit, than a node that optimizes the amount off ETFE pillows on a double curved surface. , And because of that you can see that the Dynamo team have shifted their focus on bringing out nodes and workflow for local draftsman. Nodes to create levels with dynamo or nodes to renumber room using are examples of dynamo main area of focus.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by robertobatista View Post
          Grasshopper is light years ahead of Dynamo and used by all major architectural, structural and engineering firms.
          Not at all interested in arguing about one tool vs. another.. but the second part of this sentence made me LOL. What planet do you live on, where Rhino has a market share of 100%?
          Aristide Lex @ SUFFOLK

          Comment


            #6
            Moved to the Dynamo sub-forum.
            -Alex Cunningham

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by robertobatista View Post
              Revit, which has huge modelling limitations.
              I don't know if you just don't know what you're talking about or if you just haven't used Revit enough to know that any modelling limitation in Revit is a minor one. I have yet to encounter any form that could not be modeled in Revit. While modelling complex forms can be difficult to accomplish, it can still be done, and at the same time maintain a parametric relationship to regular building elements and be used to collect data needed for construction and documentation.


              The users also plays a vital role in the development of Dynamo. Because Rhino users are generally designer or engineers seeking solution for the high end side of architecture, structural, acoustics, etc. grasshopper was develops for and by this segment of the market. They require a different set of tools. Dynamo which started off the same way as Grasshopper, doesn’t have that segment of the market to further develop its tools in the same was Grasshopper did. The average Revit user is a draftsman working for a local firm on projects that don’t require computational design tools. He rather have a proper working text tools in Revit, than a node that optimizes the amount off ETFE pillows on a double curved surface. , And because of that you can see that the Dynamo team have shifted their focus on bringing out nodes and workflow for local draftsman. Nodes to create levels with dynamo or nodes to renumber room using are examples of dynamo main area of focus.
              Again, I think you are misinformed about Revit, it's users and their level of competency. I am an average user of Revit, and as an Architect, I use it for a wide range of projects. Does Revit need better text tools? Yes. Can Dynamo help create levels or renumber rooms? Again, yes, because in order to be an actual Architect, you need to be able to produce useful drawings. And I don't care who you are, a timesaver is helpful to everyone, including high-end designers. If you want to see some of the more exciting nodes in Dynamo, check out Zach Kron's buildz blog.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by robertobatista View Post
                but the fact that it’s built on Revit,
                sorry robertobatista, but you have your "facts" wrong. Dynamo is built as a completely stand alone application, that just happens to have the capability to hook into the Revit API. It can also be hooked to Rhino. And Excel. And Inventor. And other applications. In fact, Case, Inc. has developed Rhynamo, that can take a Rhino model through Dynamo and build native Revit geometry.

                For those that actually use grasshopper and have seen/used Dynamo, they would argue that while grasshopper is "older" in terms of development and therefore capabilities, to call them "light-years" apart would be a disservice. Because Dynamo is open sourced, many Grasshopper users are taking their favorite nodes in grasshopper and creating similar nodes and capabilities in Dynamo, and then making them available to all.
                Scott D Davis
                Sr. AEC Technical Specialist
                Autodesk, Inc.
                http://bit.ly/aboutsdd

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by robertobatista View Post
                  ... And because of that you can see that the Dynamo team have shifted their focus on bringing out nodes and workflow for local draftsman. Nodes to create levels with dynamo or nodes to renumber room using are examples of dynamo main area of focus.
                  Wow. :crazy: You obviously have not seen what some people have done with Dynamo.
                  Freelance BIM Provider at Autodesk Services Marketplace | Linkedin

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Scott D Davis View Post
                    sorry robertobatista, but you have your "facts" wrong. Dynamo is built as a completely stand alone application, that just happens to have the capability to hook into the Revit API. It can also be hooked to Rhino. And Excel. And Inventor. And other applications. In fact, Case, Inc. has developed Rhynamo, that can take a Rhino model through Dynamo and build native Revit geometry.

                    For those that actually use grasshopper and have seen/used Dynamo, they would argue that while grasshopper is "older" in terms of development and therefore capabilities, to call them "light-years" apart would be a disservice. Because Dynamo is open sourced, many Grasshopper users are taking their favorite nodes in grasshopper and creating similar nodes and capabilities in Dynamo, and then making them available to all.
                    Dynamo has capabilities of creating geometry that can't translate into real Revit geometry. Take for instance a long standing wish, the ability to create 3d fillets, something pretty much all 3d (BIM) modelling software can do. Not so long ago someone released a node that can make 3d fillets to any geometry in Dynamo which is great. This translates beautifully into Inventor or even Rhino, but in Revit it imports as dumb .sat geometry which isn't editable (unless you use dynamo). The sat geometry acts like any imported 3d CAD geometry with all the visibility issues and un-schedulability and not being able to ad information to the geometry.
                    We can safely say that Revit will not improve its modelling tools for the remainders of Revit' life. There is no doubt that the combination of Inventor and Dynamo will be great, but will dynamo still be a computational design tool for Revit in a year or two when Dynamo drastically continuous to expand and improve or will it end up being just a tool to extract data out of Revit?

                    It would be interesting to see examples of firms using Dynamo for things they've done previously with Grasshopper. So far I’ve only seen sample of geometry created or data extracted from Revit but nothing on a real projects. Even at AU, ironically firms showed how they utilize Grasshopper on real projects but not Dynamo. I’ve asked around why they don't use Dynamo, they all reply the same; Why use dynamo if they can use Grasshopper for computations design.

                    Comment

                    Related Topics

                    Collapse

                    • Get analysis results from etabs using dynamo and simplex pacakge
                      Simply Complex: Hello Readers!
                      Did you know that Dynamo does not only talk with Revit?
                      It now talks with ETABS structural analysis software!...
                      November 19, 2018, 10:45 PM
                    • Dynamo
                      hi I'm completely new to hear a word Dynamo.
                      Can anybody explain what is dynamo. What can be done using Dynamo?
                      Why we need to use Dynamo?...
                      June 2, 2017, 07:19 AM
                    • Should I learn Dynamo..
                      Hello, I work in a small Arch firm, 9 people which primarily works on projects that are usually less than $10 million. I have been researching Dynamo...
                      October 3, 2016, 07:34 PM
                    • Dynamo?
                      Sorry to sound abit blunt, and not to read into it.

                      but what are the actual uses off Dynamo?
                      December 17, 2015, 08:55 AM
                    • Qualitymanagement with Dynamo and CO
                      Hello Dynos,


                      How about quality Management with Dynamo and Python?


                      What is your expierence? What can i prove...
                      October 20, 2018, 01:19 PM
                    Working...
                    X