Donate Now Goal amount for this year: 3000 USD, Received: 2477 USD (83%)

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Constraining the Input Value of a Parameter

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 31, 2016
    Current Local Time
    08:13 PM

    Constraining the Input Value of a Parameter

    Hi All,

    Sorry if this is an elementary question but I can't for the life of me figure this out!
    In the attached image I have displayed my formulas which are controlling the form of an arc upon which other geometry is hosted.

    The trigonometric functions controlling the arc 'break' when the "Rise" is greater than half of the "Span", thus breaking the family.

    What I am trying to do is implement the following formula for the value of my parameter "Rise":

    Rise = if (Rise > Span/2, Span/2, Rise)

    To circumnavigate the error message "there is a circular chain of references among the formulas" which is generated by using the parameter you wish to define in the formula I created the parameters "Rise_Constraint" and "Rise_Max Value".

    Next I created a formula to define "Rise Constraint" : if(Rise > Rise_MaxValue, Rise_MaxValue, Rise).

    I then substituted any instance of the "Rise" parameter in the formulas grouped under the Constraints category, so that these formulas would be driven by "Rise_Constraint" and not "Rise".

    With this constraint in place the geometry no longer breaks when a user inputs a value greater than "Span/2" or "Rise_MaxValue" for the value of "Rise", as the parameter driving the geometry is now "Rise_Constraint" which is constrained to a maximum value of Span / 2.

    The only issue is, as you will see in the attached image, a user can input a value greater than Span / 2 for the value of the "Rise" and it will display as such.

    For example, in the attached image:

    Span = 3000
    Rise_Max Value = Span / 2 = 1500
    Yet the input value for the "Rise" parameter is still showing as 1800 which seems counter-intuitive.

    Is there any way to modify this family so that if a value greater than "Rise_MaxValue" is input for "Rise", the value shown (currently 1800) will revert back to "Rise_MaxValue" (currently 1500).

    I know this is a minor issue as the family works perfectly fine, but I would just like it to be as user friendly for whomever is using it, and currently I think it may be a little confusing.

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Constraining the Input Value of a Parameter-current-formula-set-up.png  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    July 14, 2016
    Current Local Time
    10:13 AM
    Quite a lot of formulas and parameters here... May I ask what precisely you want to achieve? Which parameters you want users to have control over?

  3. #3
    jmk is offline
    Forum Addict jmk's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 31, 2012
    NM, USA
    Current Local Time
    03:13 AM
    No, there is not a way to do that (in native Revit, probably could wing something with plugins/dynamo) What you can do is strategically locate parameters next to each other, and name them in such a way to clarify the input.

    Rise_Actual=[grayed out, number actually controlling the formula]


    User_Rise=[yes/no or text, grayed out] Yes/NO based on input above

    You could also add tool-tips.

Similar Threads

  1. Room Schedule - Project Parameter with Multiple Input Options?
    By sbopp in forum Architecture and General Revit Questions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 18th, 2015, 05:46 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: August 31st, 2015, 12:18 PM
  3. Constraining Arcs
    By cellophane in forum Architecture - Family Creation
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: January 20th, 2014, 02:42 PM
  4. Constraining a Revolve in ALL directions.
    By ELaforge in forum Architecture and General Revit Questions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: January 18th, 2011, 01:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts