Donate Now Goal amount for this year: 3000 USD, Received: 904 USD (30%)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: RFOBenchmark v2 Virtualization results

  1. #1
    Administrator Gordon Price's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 7, 2010
    Location
    Rotterdam, South Holland
    Posts
    2,693
    Current Local Time
    09:23 PM

    RFOBenchmark v2 Virtualization results

    Please post your RFOBenchmark results for virtualization solutions here. Note that by Virtualization we mean VDI, Citrix, etc. Benchmarks of Parallels Desktop based VMs running on a Mac, for example, should be included in the regular Results thread.

    Comments and suggestions should be made in the RFOBenchmark v2 thread. The download is there too.

    Thanks!
    Gordon

  2. #2
    Member Markus's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 27, 2012
    Location
    Seattle, WA, United States of America
    Posts
    202
    Current Local Time
    12:23 PM
    RFO Benchmark v2 - RVT 2016 'Standard' Test Set 2015.09.22 @ 07.07.47 on SEA-####-#
    build: 06.09.2015 b1
    RevitForum.org

    All times are in seconds, lower is better.

    Model creation and view export benchmark
    5.83 opening and loading the custom template
    13.36 creating the floors levels and grids
    30.07 creating a group of walls and doors
    62.26 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    18.16 creating the exterior curtain wall
    12.2 creating the sections
    7.87 changing the curtain wall panel type
    37.07 export all views as PNGs at 150 dpi
    49.83 export some views as DWGs
    236.65 TOTAL

    Render benchmark
    71.29 render w/ nvidia mental ray

    v1 Graphics benchmark w/ hardware acceleration [1]
    10.31 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    10.49 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    10.09 refresh Realistic view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    3.37 rotate view x1 - with hardware acceleration

    v1 Graphics benchmark w/o hardware acceleration [2]
    21.67 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    28.62 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    29.85 refresh Realistic view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    782.87 rotate view x1 - without hardware acceleration

    [1] Graphics benchmark measures the entire graphics stack, which includes CPU and memory.
    To meaningfully compare graphics cards, test all cards in the same machine
    and use the 'v2 Graphics - expanded' benchmark.
    [2] For comparison with Hardware Accelerated graphics.

    MACHINE SPEC:
    Mfr: HP
    Model: ProLiant SL250s Gen8
    OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter -bit

    CPU:
    Max Clock Speed: 0Ghz
    Number of Processors:
    Number of Logical Processors:

    Total Physical Memory: 128GB @ Mhz

    Graphics Card: Mirage Driver
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 2.0.105.0

    Graphics Card: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
    Graphics RAM: 3.9990234375GB
    Driver version: 9.18.13.1135

    Graphics Card: Matrox G200eH (HP)
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 1.2.1.0

    Screen Resolution: xx32bit @ Hz
    Benchmark did run full screen
    __________________________________________________ _________
    Raw Data
    6.496 5.490 5.504 opening and loading the custom template
    15.490 12.266 12.326 creating the floors levels and grids
    31.637 29.191 29.371 creating a group of walls and doors
    62.375 62.701 61.715 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    18.174 18.467 17.850 creating the exterior curtain wall
    12.207 12.234 12.145 creating the sections
    7.955 7.992 7.670 changing the curtain wall panel type
    38.160 36.256 36.795 export all views as PNGs at 150 dpi
    53.510 48.465 47.502 export some views as DWGs

    70.324 72.789 70.742 render w/ nvidia mental ray

    10.113 10.816 9.994 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    10.273 11.033 10.156 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    3.012 14.064 13.184 refresh Realistic view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    1.428 4.980 3.705 rotate view x1 - with hardware acceleration

    0.051 4.740 60.215 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    0.049 0.053 85.764 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    0.049 0.051 89.457 refresh Realistic view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    12.590 12.643 2323.381 rotate view x1 - without hardware acceleration
    Last edited by Markus; September 29th, 2015 at 07:49 PM.

  3. #3
    Member Markus's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 27, 2012
    Location
    Seattle, WA, United States of America
    Posts
    202
    Current Local Time
    12:23 PM
    RFO Benchmark v2 - RVT 2016 'Standard' Test Set 2015.09.22 @ 20.43.26 on LON-####-#
    build: 06.09.2015 b1
    RevitForum.org

    All times are in seconds, lower is better.

    Model creation and view export benchmark
    9.59 opening and loading the custom template
    30.91 creating the floors levels and grids
    53.91 creating a group of walls and doors
    96.81 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    30.69 creating the exterior curtain wall
    24.03 creating the sections
    17.68 changing the curtain wall panel type
    88.87 export all views as PNGs at 150 dpi
    80.88 export some views as DWGs
    433.37 TOTAL

    Render benchmark
    112.6 render w/ nvidia mental ray

    v1 Graphics benchmark w/ hardware acceleration [1]
    0.21 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    0.23 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    0.21 refresh Realistic view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    3.64 rotate view x1 - with hardware acceleration

    v1 Graphics benchmark w/o hardware acceleration [2]
    0.22 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    0.21 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    0.14 refresh Realistic view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    32.33 rotate view x1 - without hardware acceleration

    [1] Graphics benchmark measures the entire graphics stack, which includes CPU and memory.
    To meaningfully compare graphics cards, test all cards in the same machine
    and use the 'v2 Graphics - expanded' benchmark.
    [2] For comparison with Hardware Accelerated graphics.

    MACHINE SPEC:
    Mfr: Xen
    Model: HVM domU
    OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter -bit

    CPU:
    Max Clock Speed: 0Ghz
    Number of Processors:
    Number of Logical Processors:

    Total Physical Memory: 120GB @ Mhz

    Graphics Card: Standard VGA Graphics Adapter
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 6.1.7600.16385

    Graphics Card: NVIDIA GRID K2
    Graphics RAM: 3.9990234375GB
    Driver version: 9.18.13.3221

    Graphics Card: Mirage Driver
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 2.0.105.0

    Screen Resolution: xx32bit @ Hz
    Benchmark did run full screen

    __________________________________________________ ________
    Raw Data
    11.781 9.617 7.375 opening and loading the custom template
    26.266 40.305 26.156 creating the floors levels and grids
    50.328 55.391 56.023 creating a group of walls and doors
    97.477 104.102 88.852 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    28.484 36.906 26.688 creating the exterior curtain wall
    18.445 31.117 22.516 creating the sections
    13.609 21.906 17.539 changing the curtain wall panel type
    86.844 105.031 74.742 export all views as PNGs at 150 dpi
    82.383 85.391 74.867 export some views as DWGs

    117.523 112.836 107.438 render w/ nvidia mental ray

    0.227 0.211 0.203 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    0.281 0.211 0.211 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    0.211 0.211 0.203 refresh Realistic view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    4.008 2.609 4.297 rotate view x1 - with hardware acceleration

    0.273 0.180 0.203 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    0.219 0.203 0.203 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    0.133 0.086 0.211 refresh Realistic view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    41.234 34.008 21.758 rotate view x1 - without hardware acceleration
    Last edited by Markus; September 29th, 2015 at 05:55 PM.

  4. #4
    New Member
    Join Date
    May 16, 2012
    Posts
    1
    Current Local Time
    03:23 PM
    RFO Benchmark v2 - RVT 2016 'Standard' Test Set 2015.09.23 @ 08.22.20 on GWWOVM-04
    build: 22.09.2015
    RevitForum.org

    All times are in seconds, lower is better.

    Model creation and view export benchmark
    5.27 opening and loading the custom template
    19.05 creating the floors levels and grids
    50.07 creating a group of walls and doors
    102.29 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    29.58 creating the exterior curtain wall
    17.16 creating the sections
    10.98 changing the curtain wall panel type
    89.84 export all views as PNGs at 150 dpi
    74.3 export some views as DWGs
    398.54 TOTAL

    Render benchmark
    507.41 render w/ nvidia mental ray

    v1 Graphics benchmark w/ hardware acceleration [1]
    124.78 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    124.4 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    130.83 refresh Realistic view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    84.14 rotate view x1 - with hardware acceleration

    v1 Graphics benchmark w/o hardware acceleration [2]
    248.62 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    250.17 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    253.38 refresh Realistic view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    155.93 rotate view x1 - without hardware acceleration

    [1] Graphics benchmark measures the entire graphics stack, which includes CPU and memory.
    To meaningfully compare graphics cards, test all cards in the same machine
    and use the 'v2 Graphics - expanded' benchmark.
    [2] For comparison with Hardware Accelerated graphics.


    MACHINE SPEC:
    Mfr: Xen
    Model: HVM domU
    OS: Microsoft Windows 7 Professional -bit

    CPU:
    Max Clock Speed: 0Ghz
    Number of Processors:
    Number of Logical Processors:

    Total Physical Memory: 12GB @ Mhz


    Graphics Card: Citrix Display Driver (Citrix Systems - WDDM)
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 6.2.0.57

    Graphics Card: Citrix Systems Inc. Display Mirror Driver
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 6.2.100.76


    Screen Resolution: xx32bit @ Hz
    Benchmark did run full screen



    __________________________________________________ __________
    Raw Data
    5.844 4.957 5.000 opening and loading the custom template
    19.338 18.879 18.941 creating the floors levels and grids
    49.713 50.266 50.230 creating a group of walls and doors
    100.867 102.945 103.066 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    29.158 29.762 29.828 creating the exterior curtain wall
    17.115 17.492 16.887 creating the sections
    11.053 10.965 10.922 changing the curtain wall panel type
    89.512 89.75 90.270 export all views as PNGs at 150 dpi
    73.406 74.457 75.043 export some views as DWGs

    507.779 506.977 507.488 render w/ nvidia mental ray

    123.756 125.078 125.496 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    123.842 124.367 125.004 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    129.746 131.219 131.527 refresh Realistic view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    83.199 84.422 84.812 rotate view x1 - with hardware acceleration

    250.279 247.820 247.762 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    250.314 249.547 250.644 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    253.559 253.117 253.473 refresh Realistic view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    156.738 156.098 154.969 rotate view x1 - without hardware acceleration

  5. #5
    Member Markus's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 27, 2012
    Location
    Seattle, WA, United States of America
    Posts
    202
    Current Local Time
    12:23 PM
    Unlike the previous two postings, this unit does not have a special video card - hence the poor numbers.

    RFO Benchmark v2 - RVT 2016 'Standard' Test Set 2015.09.23 @ 06.50.07 on SEA-W8XA####-#
    build: 06.09.2015 b1
    RevitForum.org

    All times are in seconds, lower is better.

    Model creation and view export benchmark
    7.48 opening and loading the custom template
    371.42 creating the floors levels and grids
    258.86 creating a group of walls and doors
    178.56 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    128.96 creating the exterior curtain wall
    359.08 creating the sections
    39.81 changing the curtain wall panel type
    103.72 export all views as PNGs at 150 dpi
    76.87 export some views as DWGs
    1524.76 TOTAL

    Render benchmark
    120.54 render w/ nvidia mental ray

    v1 Graphics benchmark w/ hardware acceleration [1]
    38.39 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    39.23 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    40.27 refresh Realistic view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    42.63 rotate view x1 - with hardware acceleration

    v1 Graphics benchmark w/o hardware acceleration [2]
    38.54 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    39.17 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    40.2 refresh Realistic view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    40.8 rotate view x1 - without hardware acceleration

    [1] Graphics benchmark measures the entire graphics stack, which includes CPU and memory.
    To meaningfully compare graphics cards, test all cards in the same machine
    and use the 'v2 Graphics - expanded' benchmark.
    [2] For comparison with Hardware Accelerated graphics.

    MACHINE SPEC:
    Mfr: HP
    Model: ProLiant DL580 G5
    OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise -bit

    CPU:
    Max Clock Speed: 0Ghz
    Number of Processors:
    Number of Logical Processors:

    Total Physical Memory: 256GB @ Mhz

    Graphics Card: Standard VGA Graphics Adapter
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 6.1.7600.16385

    Screen Resolution: xx32bit @ Hz
    Benchmark did run full screen
    __________________________________________________ ________
    Raw Data
    7.438 7.375 7.641 opening and loading the custom template
    299.096 299.205 515.955 creating the floors levels and grids
    262.379 260.186 254.023 creating a group of walls and doors
    178.510 178.572 178.584 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    120.606 120.826 145.441 creating the exterior curtain wall
    333.414 411.348 332.471 creating the sections
    32.574 54.227 32.615 changing the curtain wall panel type
    100.363 111.236 99.553 export all views as PNGs at 150 dpi
    77.064 80.379 73.180 export some views as DWGs

    120.094 121.969 119.555 render w/ nvidia mental ray

    0.080 114.996 0.094 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    0.082 117.516 0.102 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    Last edited by Markus; September 29th, 2015 at 06:08 PM.

  6. #6
    Member Markus's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 27, 2012
    Location
    Seattle, WA, United States of America
    Posts
    202
    Current Local Time
    12:23 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Markus View Post
    RFO Benchmark v2 - RVT 2016 'Standard' Test Set 2015.09.22 @ 07.07.47 on SEA-W8XA-1
    build: 06.09.2015 b1
    RevitForum.org
    RFOBenchmark v2 Virtualization results

    The values for v1 Graphics benchmark w/o hardware acceleration [2] seem wrong. Per suggestion from Gordon, I tried running it again with this trick. This time the benchmark seems more realistic.

    RFO Benchmark v2 - RVT 2016 'Standard' Test Set 2015.09.28 @ 19.48.56 on LON-####-#
    build: 06.09.2015 b1
    RevitForum.org

    All times are in seconds, lower is better.

    Model creation and view export benchmark
    9.17 opening and loading the custom template
    27.47 creating the floors levels and grids
    53.42 creating a group of walls and doors
    103.41 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    30.17 creating the exterior curtain wall
    23.27 creating the sections
    15.36 changing the curtain wall panel type
    95.6 export all views as PNGs at 150 dpi
    88.94 export some views as DWGs
    446.81 TOTAL

    Render benchmark
    111.98 render w/ nvidia mental ray

    v1 Graphics benchmark w/ hardware acceleration [1]
    13.76 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    15.53 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    19.71 refresh Realistic view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    10.08 rotate view x1 - with hardware acceleration

    v1 Graphics benchmark w/o hardware acceleration [2]
    70.02 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    91.98 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    6.2 refresh Realistic view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    39.28 rotate view x1 - without hardware acceleration

    [1] Graphics benchmark measures the entire graphics stack, which includes CPU and memory.
    To meaningfully compare graphics cards, test all cards in the same machine
    and use the 'v2 Graphics - expanded' benchmark.
    [2] For comparison with Hardware Accelerated graphics.

    MACHINE SPEC:
    Mfr: Xen
    Model: HVM domU
    OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter -bit

    CPU:
    Max Clock Speed: 0Ghz
    Number of Processors:
    Number of Logical Processors:

    Total Physical Memory: 120GB @ Mhz

    Graphics Card: Standard VGA Graphics Adapter
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 6.1.7600.16385

    Graphics Card: NVIDIA GRID K2
    Graphics RAM: 3.9990234375GB
    Driver version: 9.18.13.3221

    Graphics Card: Mirage Driver
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 2.0.105.0

    Screen Resolution: xx32bit @ Hz
    Benchmark did run full screen
    __________________________________________________ __________
    Raw Data
    8.969 10.094 8.453 opening and loading the custom template
    31.727 27.969 22.711 creating the floors levels and grids
    69.445 44.359 46.453 creating a group of walls and doors
    119.305 97.352 93.570 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    36.523 28.055 25.922 creating the exterior curtain wall
    28.336 18.625 22.844 creating the sections
    14.953 14.797 16.336 changing the curtain wall panel type
    102.273 93.656 90.859 export all views as PNGs at 150 dpi
    93.516 95.367 77.945 export some views as DWGs

    116.781 112.906 106.242 render w/ nvidia mental ray

    22.641 18.430 0.203 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    26.898 19.500 0.203 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    30.352 28.570 0.203 refresh Realistic view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    13.625 13.297 3.328 rotate view x1 - with hardware acceleration

    0.203 209.773 0.078 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    0.211 275.516 0.203 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    0.203 18.188 0.203 refresh Realistic view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    26.383 70.180 21.266 rotate view x1 - without hardware acceleration
    Last edited by Markus; September 29th, 2015 at 05:56 PM.

  7. #7
    Member Markus's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 27, 2012
    Location
    Seattle, WA, United States of America
    Posts
    202
    Current Local Time
    12:23 PM
    Same build as our London server threads #3, 6.

    RFO Benchmark v2 - RVT 2016 'Standard' Test Set 2015.09.29 @ 23.56.16 on SHA-####-#
    build: 06.09.2015 b1
    RevitForum.org

    All times are in seconds, lower is better.

    Model creation and view export benchmark
    11.45 opening and loading the custom template
    34.37 creating the floors levels and grids
    59.32 creating a group of walls and doors
    103.15 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    31.48 creating the exterior curtain wall
    21.23 creating the sections
    14.68 changing the curtain wall panel type
    87.62 export all views as PNGs at 150 dpi
    75.46 export some views as DWGs
    438.76 TOTAL

    Render benchmark
    118.78 render w/ nvidia mental ray

    v1 Graphics benchmark w/ hardware acceleration [1]
    7.32 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    7.21 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    10.01 refresh Realistic view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    8.4 rotate view x1 - with hardware acceleration

    v1 Graphics benchmark w/o hardware acceleration [2]
    47.95 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    49.62 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    54.02 refresh Realistic view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    40.64 rotate view x1 - without hardware acceleration

    [1] Graphics benchmark measures the entire graphics stack, which includes CPU and memory.
    To meaningfully compare graphics cards, test all cards in the same machine
    and use the 'v2 Graphics - expanded' benchmark.
    [2] For comparison with Hardware Accelerated graphics.

    MACHINE SPEC:
    Mfr: Xen
    Model: HVM domU
    OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter -bit

    CPU:
    Max Clock Speed: 0Ghz
    Number of Processors:
    Number of Logical Processors:

    Total Physical Memory: 120GB @ Mhz

    Graphics Card: Standard VGA Graphics Adapter
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 6.1.7600.16385

    Graphics Card: NVIDIA GRID K2
    Graphics RAM: 3.9990234375GB
    Driver version: 9.18.13.3221

    Screen Resolution: xx32bit @ Hz
    Benchmark did run full screen
    __________________________________________________ __________
    Raw Data
    11.812 11.561 10.974 opening and loading the custom template
    35.320 36.201 31.585 creating the floors levels and grids
    57.300 66.923 53.730 creating a group of walls and doors
    111.634 99.430 98.395 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    38.622 27.015 28.817 creating the exterior curtain wall
    30.229 17.880 15.569 creating the sections
    20.040 11.832 12.168 changing the curtain wall panel type
    94.973 86.091 81.783 export all views as PNGs at 150 dpi
    82.077 67.242 77.074 export some views as DWGs

    128.235 111.387 116.716 render w/ nvidia mental ray

    21.657 0.144 0.145 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    21.352 0.144 0.147 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    29.726 0.149 0.142 refresh Realistic view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    17.352 4.199 3.658 rotate view x1 - with hardware acceleration

    143.559 0.145 0.146 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    148.562 0.148 0.145 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    161.776 0.145 0.143 refresh Realistic view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    72.289 22.130 27.493 rotate view x1 - without hardware acceleration
    Last edited by Markus; September 29th, 2015 at 07:52 PM.

  8. #8
    Member Markus's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 27, 2012
    Location
    Seattle, WA, United States of America
    Posts
    202
    Current Local Time
    12:23 PM
    Expanded Test for same server thread #2

    RFO Benchmark v2 - RVT 2016 'Expanded' Test Set 2015.09.29 @ 09.06.42 on SEA-####-#
    build: 06.09.2015 b1
    RevitForum.org

    All times are in seconds, lower is better.

    Update
    15.52 update previous version file

    Model creation and view export benchmark
    5.42 opening and loading the custom template
    0.01 saving the new project
    20.46 loading and arraying link
    23.82 setting links to halftone
    1.4 saving the project with links
    49.26 creating the floors levels and grids
    29.68 creating a group of walls and doors
    61.17 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    67.96 creating the exterior curtain wall
    40.78 creating the sections
    21.53 changing the curtain wall panel type
    3.2 saving the project with completed model
    74.07 export all 40 views as PNGs at 300 dpi
    180.83 export all 40 views as DWGs
    579.59 TOTAL

    Render benchmark
    70.6 render w/ nvidia mental ray
    56.58 render w/ autodesk raytracer

    v2 expanded Graphics benchmark [1]
    54.94 change view visual style
    0.05 refresh Hidden Line view x12
    0.05 refresh Consistent Colors view x12
    0.05 refresh Realistic view x12
    37.71 activate new view
    25.42 rotate view x1

    [1] Graphics benchmark measures the entire graphics stack, which includes CPU and memory.
    To meaningfully compare graphics cards, test all cards in the same machine.

    MACHINE SPEC:
    Mfr: HP
    Model: ProLiant SL250s Gen8
    OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter -bit

    CPU:
    Max Clock Speed: 0Ghz
    Number of Processors: Pro
    Number of Logical Processors:

    Total Physical Memory: 128GB @ Mhz

    Graphics Card: Mirage Driver
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 2.0.105.0

    Graphics Card: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
    Graphics RAM: 3.9990234375GB
    Driver version: 9.18.13.1135

    Graphics Card: Matrox G200eH (HP)
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 1.2.1.0

    Screen Resolution: xx32bit @ Hz
    Benchmark did run full screen
    __________________________________________________ _________
    Raw Data
    15.586 15.453 15.441< 15.527 15.629> update previous version file

    5.555> 5.391< 5.410 5.414 5.441 opening and loading the custom template
    0.012 0.008< 0.008 0.027> 0.008 saving the new project
    21.902> 19.879< 21.262 19.934 20.172 loading and arraying link
    69.125> 23.516< 23.559 23.766 24.148 setting links to halftone
    1.582 1.270< 1.285 1.645> 1.332 saving the project with links
    57.102> 49.090 48.184< 50.090 48.590 creating the floors levels and grids
    37.191> 29.734 29.363< 29.695 29.617 creating a group of walls and doors
    69.051> 61.145 60.527< 61.410 60.961 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    76.238> 68.246 67.383< 67.953 67.688 creating the exterior curtain wall
    43.613> 40.633 40.188< 41.191 40.523 creating the sections
    23.801> 21.488 21.391< 21.609 21.5000 changing the curtain wall panel type
    5.004> 2.898< 3.602 3.062 2.949 saving the project with completed model
    74.121 74.797> 74.012 73.652< 74.066 export all 40 views as PNGs at 300 dpi
    184.648> 179.516 178.938< 182.598 180.363 export all 40 views as DWGs

    70.484 81.512> 70.117< 70.660 70.656 render w/ nvidia mental ray
    69.949> 56.582 55.707< 56.648 56.512 render w/ autodesk raytracer

    55.133 55.074 54.605 54.016< 55.219> change view visual style
    264.703> 0.047< 0.051 0.051 0.051 refresh Hidden Line view x12
    29.742> 0.051 0.051 0.047< 0.051 refresh Consistent Colors view x12
    0.051< 0.051> 0.051 0.051 0.051 refresh Realistic view x12
    36.371< 38.105> 37.773 37.512 37.832 activate new view
    22.121< 25.352 25.430 45.512> 25.465 rotate view x1
    Last edited by Markus; September 29th, 2015 at 07:52 PM.

  9. #9
    New Member
    Join Date
    April 19, 2014
    Posts
    1
    Current Local Time
    02:23 PM
    RFO Benchmark v2 - RVT 2016 'Expanded' Test Set 2015.11.03 @ 09.21.56 on A2KCLOUD3WS01
    build: 22.09.2015
    RevitForum.org

    All times are in seconds, lower is better.

    Update
    10.12 update previous version file

    Model creation and view export benchmark
    3.8 opening and loading the custom template
    0.01 saving the new project
    15.07 loading and arraying link
    37.96 setting links to halftone
    0.73 saving the project with links
    36.8 creating the floors levels and grids
    23.3 creating a group of walls and doors
    40.96 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    45.74 creating the exterior curtain wall
    24.76 creating the sections
    6.24 changing the curtain wall panel type
    8.6 saving the project with completed model
    50.51 export all 40 views as PNGs at 300 dpi
    110.29 export all 40 views as DWGs
    404.77 TOTAL

    Render benchmark
    102.93 render w/ nvidia mental ray
    119.21 render w/ autodesk raytracer

    v2 expanded Graphics benchmark [1]
    31.19 change view visual style
    126.59 refresh Hidden Line view x12
    128.21 refresh Consistent Colors view x12
    135.11 refresh Realistic view x12
    33.86 activate new view
    23.06 rotate view x1

    [1] Graphics benchmark measures the entire graphics stack, which includes CPU and memory.
    To meaningfully compare graphics cards, test all cards in the same machine.


    MACHINE SPEC:
    Mfr: Supermicro
    Model: SYS-5018GR-T
    OS: Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise64-bit

    CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1630 v3 @ 3.70GHz
    Max Clock Speed: 3.701Ghz
    Number of Processors: 4
    Number of Logical Processors: 8

    Total Physical Memory: 32GB @ 2133 2133 2133 2133Mhz


    Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
    Graphics RAM: 3.9990234375GB
    Driver version: 10.18.13.5850


    Screen Resolution: 1920x1200x32bit @ 59Hz
    Benchmark did run full screen



    __________________________________________________ __________
    Raw Data
    9.996 10.117 10.258> 9.984< 10.234 update previous version file

    3.848> 3.730 3.719< 3.836 3.848 opening and loading the custom template
    0.008< 0.008> 0.008 0.008 0.008 saving the new project
    15.082 15.047 14.969< 15.086 15.340> loading and arraying link
    38.008 37.691< 37.75 38.129 38.141> setting links to halftone
    0.719 0.719 0.773> 0.707< 0.758 saving the project with links
    37.078 36.738 36.309< 36.574 37.316> creating the floors levels and grids
    23.281 23.477> 23.238 23.199< 23.371 creating a group of walls and doors
    41.082 41.336> 40.898 40.566< 40.891 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    45.934 45.699 45.312< 45.574 45.961> creating the exterior curtain wall
    24.648< 24.762 24.852 24.676 24.902> creating the sections
    6.088< 6.242 6.262> 6.223 6.246 changing the curtain wall panel type
    8.559 8.629 8.668> 8.539< 8.602 saving the project with completed model
    50.695 50.520 50.102< 50.324 50.727> export all 40 views as PNGs at 300 dpi
    109.957< 110.309 110.344 110.219 110.559> export all 40 views as DWGs

    102.590< 103.195 102.711 102.891 103.984> render w/ nvidia mental ray
    119.629 118.516 117.625< 119.492 121.590> render w/ autodesk raytracer

    31.129< 31.152 31.379> 31.176 31.246 change view visual style
    126.312 126.957 128.801> 126.508 125.465< refresh Hidden Line view x12
    126.852< 127.230 130.188 127.215 77629.395> refresh Consistent Colors view x12
    134.219 135.941 138.164> 135.164 134.023< refresh Realistic view x12
    33.711 33.996 34.359> 33.867 33.699< activate new view
    23.020 23.102 23.148> 23.062 22.707< rotate view x1

  10. #10
    New Member
    Join Date
    March 6, 2015
    Posts
    2
    Current Local Time
    11:23 PM
    Hello. Why all are equal 0?

    RFO Benchmark v2 - RVT 2015 'Standard' Test Set 2015.11.30 @ 09.17.58 on BPSVID7W01
    build: 22.09.2015
    RevitForum.org

    All times are in seconds, lower is better.

    Model creation and view export benchmark
    0.00 opening and loading the custom template
    0.00 creating the floors levels and grids
    0.00 creating a group of walls and doors
    0.00 modifying the group by adding a curtain wall
    0.00 creating the exterior curtain wall
    0.00 creating the sections
    0.00 changing the curtain wall panel type
    0.00 export all views as PNGs at 150 dpi
    0.00 export some views as DWGs
    0.00 TOTAL

    Render benchmark
    0.00 render w/ nvidia mental ray

    v1 Graphics benchmark w/ hardware acceleration [1]
    0.00 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    0.00 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    0.00 refresh Realistic view x12 - with hardware acceleration
    0.00 rotate view x1 - with hardware acceleration

    v1 Graphics benchmark w/o hardware acceleration [2]
    0.00 refresh Hidden Line view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    0.00 refresh Consistent Colors view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    0.00 refresh Realistic view x12 - without hardware acceleration
    0.00 rotate view x1 - without hardware acceleration

    [1] Graphics benchmark measures the entire graphics stack, which includes CPU and memory.
    To meaningfully compare graphics cards, test all cards in the same machine
    and use the 'v2 Graphics - expanded' benchmark.
    [2] For comparison with Hardware Accelerated graphics.


    MACHINE SPEC:
    Mfr: Xen
    Model: HVM domU
    OS: Microsoft Windows 7 Профессиональная 64-bit

    CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz
    Max Clock Speed: 3.3Ghz
    Number of Processors: 4
    Number of Logical Processors: 4

    Total Physical Memory: 24GB @ Mhz


    Graphics Card: Citrix Display Driver (Citrix Systems - WDDM)
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 7.6.0.5006

    Graphics Card: Citrix Display Mirror Driver
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 6.3.0.44

    Graphics Card: Citrix Systems Inc. Display Mirror Driver
    Graphics RAM: 0GB
    Driver version: 7.6.0.188

    Graphics Card: NVIDIA GRID K240Q
    Graphics RAM: 0.875GB
    Driver version: 9.18.13.4108


    Screen Resolution: xx32bit @ Hz
    Benchmark did NOT run full screen

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. RFOBenchmark v2 2016 results
    By Gordon Price in forum Hardware and Infrastructure
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: April 23rd, 2016, 07:05 AM
  2. RFOBenchmark 2014 results
    By Gordon Price in forum Hardware and Infrastructure
    Replies: 101
    Last Post: April 7th, 2016, 12:40 PM
  3. RFOBenchmark 2015 results
    By Gordon Price in forum Hardware and Infrastructure
    Replies: 195
    Last Post: February 2nd, 2016, 05:45 PM
  4. RFOBenchmark v2 2014 results
    By Gordon Price in forum Hardware and Infrastructure
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 22nd, 2015, 08:49 AM
  5. RFOBenchmark 2013 results
    By Gordon Price in forum Hardware and Infrastructure
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: August 14th, 2014, 04:22 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •